When Standing Falls Short: Why AEG’s Bid Protest Over Djibouti Fuel Contract Was Dismissed

Associated Energy Grp., LLC v. United States Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit addressed a challenge by Associated Energy Group, LLC (AEG) over a U.S. Department of Defense fuel contract for military bases in…

Read More

Who Gets to Use “MONEY MART” for Pawn Shops? Federal Circuit Clarifies Trademark Priority Rules

Dollar Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Brittex Fin., Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In the recent case of Dollar Financial Group, Inc. v. Brittex Financial, Inc., the Federal Circuit addressed a dispute over who had the right to use the…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies: Patent Claims Listing Separate Ingredients Require Separate Components

Regeneron Pharms., Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed that when a patent claim lists components separately—like a “VEGF antagonist” and a “buffer”—those elements must be distinct in the…

Read More

Jepson Claims Face Higher Written Description Bar in In re Xencor, Inc.

In re Xencor, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the rejection of Xencor, Inc.’s patent application (U.S. Patent Application No. 16/803,690) for failing to provide an adequate written description, particularly focusing on…

Read More

Patent Term Extensions for Reissued Patents: Merck v. Aurobindo Clarifies the Rules

Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a significant decision for pharmaceutical patent holders, the Federal Circuit has clarified how patent term extensions (PTEs) apply to reissued patents in the case…

Read More

When Is a Trademark Generic? Federal Circuit Clarifies in “Fireball” Whiskey Dispute

Bullshine Distillery LLC v. Sazerac Brands, LLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent Federal Circuit decision, Bullshine Distillery LLC v. Sazerac Brands, LLC, tackled the question of when a term is considered generic for trademark purposes. The case centered…

Read More

Understanding Patents and Trademarks: Key Protections for Innovation and Branding

A patent is essentially a government-granted right that allows the holder to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing a particular invention for a set period of time. This protection encourages innovation by ensuring that inventors have exclusive rights…

Read More

Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB Decision in CQV v. Merck Over Prior Art Evidence

CQV Co., Ltd. v. Merck Pat. GmbH Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In the recent case of CQV Co., Ltd. v. Merck Patent GmbH, the Federal Circuit addressed a dispute over the validity of U.S. Patent No. 10,647,861, which covers…

Read More

Patent Board’s Ruling Vacated Over Expert Qualifications and Claim Interpretation in Sierra Wireless v. Sisvel

Sierra Wireless v. Sisvel S.P.A Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling that had found several claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,869,396 unpatentable. The patent, owned…

Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Finding of Obviousness in AliveCor v. Apple Patent Dispute

Alivecor, Inc. v. Apple Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a closely watched case, the Federal Circuit has affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decision that all claims of three AliveCor patents related to wearable heart monitoring…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies “Pull Cord” in Tactical Vest Patent Dispute

IQRIS Techs. LLC v. Point Blank Enters Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit addressed how the term “pull cord” should be interpreted in a patent dispute between IQRIS Technologies LLC and Point Blank Enterprises,…

Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms Obviousness Ruling for ImmunoGen’s Cancer Drug Dosing Patent Application

ImmunoGen, Inc. v. Stewart Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed that ImmunoGen, Inc. was not entitled to a patent for a specific dosing regimen of its cancer drug, IMGN853 (mirvetuximab soravtansine), used to…

Read More