U.S. Trademark Specimens: What You Need to Know

Authored by: Blake R. Hartz Understanding trademark specimen requirements is one of the most misunderstood aspects of U.S. trademark prosecution. A specimen that fails to meet the USPTO’s requirements can lead to office actions, delays, and additional costs that are…

Read More

When pH Means More Than Just a Number: Standard Temperature Wins the Day

ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS LTD v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent Federal Circuit decision affirmed that a pharmaceutical patent’s reference to “a pH of 13 or higher” refers to a measurement taken at standard laboratory temperature (25±2°C),…

Read More

USPTO Cracks Down on Patent Fraud: Over 3,800 Applications Terminated

The USPTO’s Patent Fraud Mitigation Unit is aggressively targeting unauthorized representatives and fraudulent submissions in patent proceedings, and the numbers are striking. Bad actors operating as unauthorized representatives undermine the integrity of the patent system, delay legitimate applications, and increase…

Read More

Indiana High School Athletes Can Now Monetize Their Personal Brand: What Families, Athletes, and Businesses Need to Know About the IHSAA’s New Personal Branding Activities Rule

Authored by: Joshua P. Astin For years, Indiana stood as one of a shrinking number of states that entirely prohibited high school athletes from profiting off their name, image, or likeness. That changes next school year. On May 4, 2026,…

Read More

When “About” Becomes Too Vague: Federal Circuit Affirms Indefiniteness in Poultry Treatment Patent

ENVIRO TECH CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC. v. SAFE FOODS CORP. Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court ruling that invalidated claims of a poultry processing patent owned by Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc., finding that…

Read More

Federal Circuit Splits the Signal on Patent Eligibility for Digital Communication Constellations

CONSTELLATION DESIGNS, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The Federal Circuit recently issued a mixed decision in a patent infringement dispute involving the technology behind modern digital television broadcasts. The case centered on patents owned by…

Read More

World Intellectual Property Day 2026: IP and Sports — Ready, Set, Innovate

Every year on April 26, the global community celebrates World Intellectual Property Day, an initiative led by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to highlight how intellectual property shapes innovation, creativity, and economic growth. In 2026, the spotlight turns to…

Read More

NIL branding opportunities require knowing right context

NIL Branding Opportunities: Context Is Key A recent article by Josh Astin and Andrew Nevill in The Indiana Lawyer offers a timely reminder for anyone advising in the name, image, and likeness (NIL) space: opportunity is abundant, but it is…

Read More

Prior Art Patents Sink Trade Secret Claims Over Cosmetic Implant Technology

INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICES, INC. v. CORNELL Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The Federal Circuit reversed a multimillion-dollar trade secret verdict in a case involving competing cosmetic penile implants. Plaintiffs International Medical Devices, Inc. (IMD) and Dr. James Elist, the makers…

Read More

Well-Known Antibodies Used in a New Way Get a Pass on Patent Disclosure Requirements

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL GMBH v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A jury found that Eli Lilly willfully infringed three Teva patents covering methods of treating headaches using humanized anti-CGRP antagonist antibodies. The district court then overturned…

Read More

Engine Tuning Patent Invalidated by Device Sold Years Before the Patent’s Priority Date

DEFINITIVE HOLDINGS v. POWERTEQ Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The Federal Circuit affirmed that U.S. Patent No. 8,458,689 is invalid because a similar device was already being sold to the public years before the patent’s critical date. Definitive Holdings sued…

Read More

Stipulations Have Consequences: Federal Circuit Revives Patent Infringement Claims Over Multicore Processor Technology

VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky VLSI Technology LLC sued Intel Corporation for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,566,836, which covers methods and systems for selecting the best-performing core in a multicore processor to handle…

Read More