
To succeed, you must stand out.
A company’s unique difference might exist in the form of an invention, a business process, a product design, a catchy slogan, a written manual, a product name, or even a customer list. These areas of distinction are called “Intellectual Property” – and often they are a business’s most valuable assets. It’s whatever you offer that no one else can provide.
We protect what makes your business unique.
At Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner LLP, our attorneys specialize in identifying, protecting, and preserving your intellectual property, a requirement for success in today’s highly competitive marketplace. Our attorneys focus exclusively in intellectual property, practicing in specific areas including patent, trademark, copyright and unfair competition law in all state and federal courts, practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the United State Copyright Office, and proceedings before the International Trade Commission. When a dispute threatens clients’ intellectual property assets, our team of dedicated trial attorneys vigorously enforces and defends clients’ rights throughout the entire litigation and appeal process.
See what’s new
Recent news
Claiming the Impossible: Clear Claims Can Still Fail for Lack of Enablement
October 1, 2026
SATIUS HOLDING, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A patent claim that covers something physically impossible is not necessarily unclear. But as Satius Holding learned, clarity will not save it. The Federal Circuit disagreed with…
Read MoreFederal Circuit Tells Trial Court to Explain Why Ignoring Red Flags About Patent Eligibility Wasn’t Sanctionable
September 30, 2026
EPIC TECH, LLC v. PEN-TECH ASSOCIATES, INC. Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A patent owner that pressed an infringement suit despite a stack of warning signs about its patent’s validity will get another look from the district court, after the…
Read MoreSplitting a Patent in Two Doesn’t Create Two Cases: Appeal Tossed for Lack of a Final Judgment
September 30, 2026
PARKERVISION, INC. v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A long-running dispute between ParkerVision and Qualcomm has produced a useful reminder about appellate timing: a district court generally cannot carve up a single patent and send only part of…
Read MoreCase Studies
The Legacy of Innovation: Syndicate Sales in the Floral Industry
Syndicate Sales is a family-owned business that has been dedicated to the floral industry since 1946. With a diverse portfolio of over 1,500 products, the company serves customers across all 50 states, as well as in Canada, South America, Europe,…
Read More
Helping Candy Dynamics Maximize the Value of their Brands
Since 2001 Candy Dynamics has pushed the boundaries of flavor and sour in the candy business. Its flagship product, Toxic Waste® Hazardously Sour Candy®, is an innovative and phenomenally popular, one-of-a-kind, double-action sour candy treat that has become a hit…
Read More