Skip to main content
site logo
  • About Us
    • Firm Profile
    • History
    • Leadership
    • Careers
    • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • All Practice Areas
    • Patents
    • Trademarks
    • Litigation
    • Copyrights
    • Trade Secrets
    • Licensing
    • Mediation | Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Professionals
  • Insights
    • All Insights
    • News & Updates
    • Case Studies
  • Contact
  • Firm Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Professionals
  • Insights
  • Contact
Your browser is outdated. Upgrade to a modern browser to better experience this site.

News & Updates

news and updates icon

January 13, 2012

Dealing with Fake vs. Imposter Twitter Accounts

Twitter is an online social interaction platform which enables users to share their thoughts and interact with the public and other users 140 characters at a time.  Twitter has grown in popularity exponentially over the past few years, and as part of that, users are seeking to gather “followers” as quickly as possible to draw attention to their account.  Often times, in order to attract “followers” quickly, users latch on to prominent figures or celebrities by mimicking them.  This is motivated by the fact that Twitter users with a large number of followers can be paid large sums of money to “tweet” on behalf of a business, a product, or an event.  For example, Terrell Owens, a former NFL football player, has reportedly been paid up to $20,000 per tweet.  Other times, users simply create these accounts as parodies for enjoyment.

 As a consequence, fake Twitter accounts are quite common, with some causing confusion and potentially harm through impersonation.  Twitter is well aware of the abundant creation of “fake” Twitter accounts.  Initially, in order to combat this problem, Twitter established its “Verified” program which enables a well known user to establish a Twitter account and have it displayed with a “Verified Badge” in order to definitely identify a well known user’s actual account.  The Verified program is very limited in scope and is not open to the public.  Therefore, in order to participate, an individual would need to have a very high nationwide profile.

Despite this effort to promote clarity, Twitter allows “fake” Twitter accounts when used under certain circumstances.  Twitter only draws the line where a user creates an account and uses it to “impersonate” someone else.  According to Twitter’s policies, so long as the account’s profile “make[s] it clear that the creator of the account is not actually the same person or entity as the subject of the parody/commentary” then the account is an acceptable form of user expression.  Examples of how such an account is acceptably designated include: 

– using the words “not, “fake” or “fan” in the username

– using words such as “not, “fake” or “fan” in addition to the exact name of the person in the account’s name

– making the purpose of the account as a parody or fan page clear in the account’s biographical section, or

– refraining from communications which suggest that the user is in fact the real person

 In the event a user is in violation of these guidelines, an account is considered to be an impermissible “imposter”, and Twitter will require the user to revise the account information to bring it into compliance with the above guidelines or face the suspension of the account.  To initiate an investigation into a Twitter account, an authorized user may simply submit an online takedown request.  The use of these requests can be very powerful in ensuring that permissible “fake” Twitter accounts are clearly identified as such to the public to prevent any mistake or harm.

 For more information or answers to any questions you may have, please contact us at Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett, & Henry LLP.

Categories

  • Activities & Honors
  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Copyright Updates
  • Litigation Updates
  • Mediation Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • News & Updates
  • Patent Updates
  • Trademark Updates

Archives

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023

Recent Posts

  • The Power of the Patent
  • How website terms of service may impact copyright claims
  • Woodard Emhardt Attorneys Named to the 2025 Indiana Super Lawyers® List
  • The Firm and Attorneys Ranked Among Top Trademark Practices in WTR 1000 2025 Edition
  • Helping Candy Dynamics Maximize the Value of their Brands
footer logo
© 2025 Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP | Copyright & Usage
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP
111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700
Indianapolis, IN 46204-5137
Phone: 317.634.3456
Fax: 317.637.7561
FAQ
This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent counsel for advice on any legal matter. Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner LLP cannot guarantee that the content of this web site is complete or up to date.