Federal Circuit Orders New Trial on LED Tube Lamp Patents After Exclusion of Key Evidence

Jiaxing Super Lighting Elec. Appliance, Co., v. CH Lighting Tech. Co Authored by: Jeremy J. Justrowsky In a significant patent dispute over LED tube lamp technology, the Federal Circuit has sent the case of Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co.,…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Interference Estoppel in Patent Reviews: IGT v. Zynga

IGT v. Zynga Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a significant decision for patent litigation and the gaming industry, the Federal Circuit affirmed the unpatentability of several claims in IGT’s U.S. Patent No. 7,168,089, which covers secure software transfers…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Use of Applicant Admitted Prior Art in Patent Challenges

Shockwave Med., Inc. v. Cardiovascular Sys Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In the recent case of Shockwave Medical, Inc. v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., the Federal Circuit addressed how “Applicant Admitted Prior Art” (AAPA) can be used in patent challenges before…

Read More

Patent Board Denies Rehearing for DeepMind’s Machine Learning Patent Application

USPTO Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied a request for rehearing from DeepMind Technologies Limited regarding their U.S. Patent Application No. 16/319,040. The application, which focuses on improving machine…

Read More

Federal Circuit Upholds Janssen’s Invega Sustenna Patent Against Obviousness Challenge

Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a significant decision for pharmaceutical patent holders, the Federal Circuit has affirmed the validity of Janssen Pharmaceuticals’ U.S. Patent No. 9,439,906, which covers specific dosing regimens…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Obviousness Standards for Drug Dosing Patents

Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit provided important guidance on how courts should analyze the obviousness of pharmaceutical dosing regimen patents. The case involved Janssen’s U.S.…

Read More

Federal Circuit Narrows “Consisting Essentially Of” in Eye Therapies v. Slayback Pharma Patent Dispute

Eye Therapies, LLC v. Slayback Pharma, LLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a significant decision for patent claim interpretation, the Federal Circuit recently reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling in Eye Therapies, LLC v. Slayback Pharma,…

Read More

Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Mitek’s Declaratory Judgment Suit Against USAA Over Mobile Banking Patents

Mitek Sys. v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a declaratory judgment action brought by Mitek Systems, Inc. against United Services Automobile Association (USAA) regarding four…

Read More

Patent Owner’s Silence Not Enough: Federal Circuit Revives Fraunhofer’s Patent Suit Against Sirius XM

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur F_rderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s ruling that had blocked Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung E.V. from…

Read More

Who Can Appeal a Patent Board Decision? Dolby Labs Learns the Limits

Dolby Labs. Licensing Corp. v. Unified Pats., LLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The Federal Circuit recently dismissed an appeal by Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, clarifying when a party can challenge a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision in…

Read More

Patent Lexicography Takes Center Stage in Alnylam v. Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Dispute

Alnylam Pharms., Inc. v. Moderna, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling in the high-profile patent dispute between Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Moderna, Inc. over Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine, SPIKEVAX®.…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Patent Claim Scope in X-Ray Imaging Dispute

Sigray, Inc. v. Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit addressed the proper interpretation of patent claims relating to X-ray imaging technology, specifically focusing on U.S. Patent No. 7,400,704, owned…

Read More