Federal Circuit IP Digest
No Contradiction, No Problem: Federal Circuit Clarifies Patent Claim Language on Lithium-Ion Batteries
March 6, 2024
Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Tech. Ltd Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit provided important guidance on how patent claims should be interpreted when it comes to potentially conflicting language. The case involved Maxell, Ltd.,…
Read MorePatent Claims on Targeted Online Ads Face Mixed Results in Court
March 5, 2024
Chewy, Inc. v. IBM Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision from the Federal Circuit highlights the challenges of enforcing patents related to online advertising and targeted marketing. The dispute centered on two patents owned by IBM: U.S. Patent…
Read MoreAlexa’s Shopping List Feature Survives Patent Challenge Over Voice-Processing Technology
February 26, 2024
Freshub, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision from the Federal Circuit has clarified the boundaries of patent infringement when it comes to voice-processing technology, specifically in the context of Amazon’s Alexa shopping-list feature. Freshub,…
Read MoreDon’t Try to Sneak in Extra Arguments by Incorporating Briefs—The Court is Watching
February 16, 2024
Promptu Sys. Corp. v. Comcast Cable Commc’ns, LLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit sent a clear message to attorneys: you can’t get around word limits by “incorporating by reference” arguments from one legal…
Read MoreTrademark Board Must Reconsider Baby Product Confusion Case After Evidence Overlooked
February 15, 2024
Naterra Int’l, Inc. v. Bensalem Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision highlights how important it is for the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to fully consider all relevant evidence when deciding if two trademarks are likely to…
Read MoreUSPTO’s Domicile Address Rule for Trademark Applicants Upheld
February 13, 2024
In re Chestek PLLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision has clarified that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can require all trademark applicants to provide their actual domicile address—not just a mailing address or P.O. box—when…
Read MoreUniversity’s Alzheimer’s Mouse Patent Blocked by Government License Under Bayh-Dole Act
February 9, 2024
Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. United States Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent Federal Circuit decision highlights how the Bayh-Dole Act can give the federal government broad rights to use patented inventions developed with federal funding—even…
Read MorePatent Claim Construction Gets a Reset in High-Tech TV Voice Command Dispute
February 9, 2024
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Philip Morris Prods. S.A Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals has shaken up a long-running patent dispute over voice-controlled television technology. Promptu Systems Corporation accused Comcast…
Read MoreOperating Manuals Can Be Prior Art: Federal Circuit Clarifies Public Accessibility Standard
February 8, 2024
Weber, Inc. v. Provisur Techs., Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a significant decision for patent law, the Federal Circuit has clarified when company operating manuals can count as “printed publications” that qualify as prior art against patents. The…
Read MoreWhen Are Patent Claim Inputs Truly “Distinct”? Court Clarifies in Smart Thermostat Patent Dispute
February 7, 2024
Google LLC v. Ecofactor, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision involving Google LLC and EcoFactor, Inc. sheds light on how patent claims should be interpreted, especially when it comes to whether listed inputs in a method claim…
Read MoreWhen Are Patent Claim Inputs Truly “Distinct”? Court Clarifies in Smart Thermostat Patent Dispute
February 7, 2024
Google LLC v. Ecofactor, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent decision involving Google LLC and EcoFactor, Inc. sheds light on how patent claims should be interpreted, especially when it comes to whether listed inputs in a method claim…
Read MoreSlogan “EVERYBODY VS RACISM” Denied Trademark Protection for Failing to Identify a Single Source
January 22, 2024
In re Go & Assocs., LLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision that denied trademark registration for the phrase “EVERYBODY VS RACISM.” The applicant, GO & Associates,…
Read More