How website terms of service may impact copyright claims

In the March 26, 2025 edition of The Indiana Lawyer, Blake Hartz and Shane Moreillon urge social media users to take a closer look at the terms of service they often agree to without much thought. These agreements typically grant…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits on Patent Damages for Convoyed Sales in Car Wash System Dispute

Wash World Inc. v. Belanger Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit addressed important issues about patent claim construction and damages in the case of Wash World Inc. v. Belanger Inc., involving a patented…

Read More

In re Riggs Clarifies Who Gets the Benefit of a Provisional Patent’s Filing Date

In re Riggs Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky The Federal Circuit recently decided In re Riggs which sheds new light on when a published patent application can use the filing date of its earlier provisional application to qualify as prior…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Prosecution Disclaimer in Maquet v. Abiomed Patent Dispute

Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc. Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a lower court’s ruling in the patent dispute between Maquet Cardiovascular LLC and Abiomed Inc., providing important guidance on how prosecution…

Read More

Tax Win for Generics: Federal Circuit Says Hatch-Waxman Litigation Costs Are Deductible Business Expenses

Actavis Lab’ys FL, Inc. v. United States Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a major decision for the generic pharmaceutical industry, the Federal Circuit in Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. v. United held that the legal expenses generic drug makers incur…

Read More

Who Gets to Use “MONEY MART” for Pawn Shops? Federal Circuit Clarifies Trademark Priority Rules

Dollar Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Brittex Fin., Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In the recent case of Dollar Financial Group, Inc. v. Brittex Financial, Inc., the Federal Circuit addressed a dispute over who had the right to use the…

Read More

When Standing Falls Short: Why AEG’s Bid Protest Over Djibouti Fuel Contract Was Dismissed

Associated Energy Grp., LLC v. United States Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit addressed a challenge by Associated Energy Group, LLC (AEG) over a U.S. Department of Defense fuel contract for military bases in…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits on Raising New Arguments in Patent Appeals

AMP Plus, Inc. v. DMF, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In AMP Plus, Inc. v. DMF, Inc., the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) regarding a dispute over U.S. Patent No.…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies: Patent Claims Listing Separate Ingredients Require Separate Components

Regeneron Pharms., Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed that when a patent claim lists components separately—like a “VEGF antagonist” and a “buffer”—those elements must be distinct in the…

Read More

Jepson Claims Face Higher Written Description Bar in In re Xencor, Inc.

In re Xencor, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the rejection of Xencor, Inc.’s patent application (U.S. Patent Application No. 16/803,690) for failing to provide an adequate written description, particularly focusing on…

Read More

Patent Term Extensions for Reissued Patents: Merck v. Aurobindo Clarifies the Rules

Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky In a significant decision for pharmaceutical patent holders, the Federal Circuit has clarified how patent term extensions (PTEs) apply to reissued patents in the case…

Read More

When Is a Trademark Generic? Federal Circuit Clarifies in “Fireball” Whiskey Dispute

Bullshine Distillery LLC v. Sazerac Brands, LLC Authored by: Jeremy J. Gustrowsky A recent Federal Circuit decision, Bullshine Distillery LLC v. Sazerac Brands, LLC, tackled the question of when a term is considered generic for trademark purposes. The case centered…

Read More